“There’s an important civic aspect to this. However, he said that while he eventually would like to see APTV “weaned off of public money,” he believes it serves an important purpose that warrants government financial support now.
![ideological problems with ithenticate ideological problems with ithenticate](http://www.joem.ir/data/cm/coversheet/1626883270.jpg)
Pittman, who once proposed zeroing out APTV’s budget, is a strong advocate of limited government who doesn’t believe in taxpayer-financed television. Trip Pittman, who ran the committee for five years before turning the reins over to Orr, was a tougher case. “So when weighed against those kinds of critical decisions in tough years, public television has to batten down the hatches and deal with what it has.” “Our schoolchildren need to advance and we need to make sure they can read,” he said. But he supported the deep cuts it endured because he believed that other areas of the budget should take priority. Unlike some lawmakers, Orr said, he never had ideological problems with APTV. Arthur Orr, chairman of the committee that handles APTV’s budget. What he’s been able to accomplish through the lean years has shown that he’s a good steward of what he’s been given and I think he can make it much better than it already is,” said Republican state Sen. “There’s a lot of confidence in Roy and the leadership he has shown. When the state’s fiscal situation improved, he made a strong case for restoring some of the cuts made earlier in the decade. When Executive Director Roy Clem took over in late 2012, APTV’s budget had decreased 61 percent since fiscal 2008 and 54 percent of the staff had been laid off.īut Clem earned a reputation among lawmakers as a frugal manager who could make do with what he had. That increase was in sharp contrast to the beating APTV took during the recession and as the network dealt with a management scandal caused by what critics regarded as lavish and careless spending.
![ideological problems with ithenticate ideological problems with ithenticate](https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/data/ilt/coversheet/cover_en.jpg)
#IDEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS WITH ITHENTICATE TV#
One stunning example of a legislative change of heart was in Alabama, where lawmakers approved a whopping 35 percent increase to the Alabama Public TV (APTV) network - the largest boost in the country for fiscal 2017. There also are signs at the federal level that public TV is no longer a top target of budgeters and small-government advocates: The Senate Appropriations Committee in June voted 29-1 to approve the Obama administration’s $445 million request for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which distributes money to state TV and radio stations. Public television wasn’t specifically targeted in any of the seven states, but took its share of cuts as lawmakers struggled with budget shortfalls, APTS said. Of the seven states that reduced spending, only three enacted cuts greater than 3 percent. (The budget numbers for the remaining states were not available.) In the current budget year, according to APTS, 13 states increased spending on their public TV networks and radio stations, 10 kept spending level and seven cut spending. Public television is a tiny share of state budgets, usually no more than 1 percent.